Insert title here

HTML Full Text

Review Article


Year: 2026 |Volume: 7 | Issue: 03 |Pages: 155-166


Preventive Measures in Agad tantra: Classical Framework from Sushruta and Its Contemporary Relevance

About Author

Gavhale M.1 , Solanki V.2 , Muzzammel M. 3 , Kamble S. 4

1Final year MD scholar, Department of Agad tantra, Institute of Teaching & Research in Ayurveda, Jamnagar, Gujarat.

2Prof. and Head Department of Agad tantra, Institute of Teaching & Research in Ayurveda, Jamnagar, Gujarat.

3Assistant Prof. Department of Agad tantra, Institute of Teaching & Research in Ayurveda, Jamnagar, Gujarat.

4Prof Department of Basic Principles, Institute of Teaching & Research in Ayurveda, Jamnagar, Gujarat.

Correspondence Address:

Dr. Mayuri R. Gavhale Final year MD scholar, Department of Agad tantra, Institute of Teaching & Research in Ayurveda, Jamnagar, Gujarat Email- mayurigavhale24@gmail.com, Mobile no: - 9673915885

Date of Acceptance: 2026-03-25

Date of Publication:2026-04-13

Article-ID:IJIM_547_04_26 http://ijim.co.in

Source of Support: Nill

Conflict of Interest: Non declared

How To Cite This Article: Gavhale M., Solanki V., Muzzammel M., Kamble S. Preventive Measures in Agad tantra: Classical Framework from Sushruta and Its Contemporary Relevance. Int J Ind Med 2026;7(03):155-166 DOI: http://doi.org/10.55552/IJIM.2026.70320

Abstract

Background: Ayurveda emphasizes prevention as the primary goal of healthcare, and Agadtantra extends this principle into toxicology by focusing on early detection and avoidance of toxic exposures. In the modern era, increasing environmental and synthetic toxin exposure contributes significantly to both acute and chronic diseases. Objective: To critically analyze preventive toxicological principles described in Sushruta Samhita Kalpa Sthana Chapter 1 and correlate them with contemporary toxicology and disease manifestations. Materials and Methods: A qualitative classical textual analysis of Sushruta Samhita Kalpa Sthana Chapter 1 with Dalhana commentary was conducted. Concepts were categorized into exposure pathways, manifestations, diagnostic methods, and preventive strategies, and interpreted in light of modern toxicological science. Results: Sushruta’s descriptions of exposure pathways, clinical features, and diagnostic approaches correspond closely with modern understanding of toxic exposure and disease causation. Preventive strategies demonstrate strong alignment with current preventive health principles. Conclusion: Agadtantra provides a comprehensive and practical framework for preventive toxicology, highly relevant in addressing contemporary environmental and lifestyle-related diseases.

Keywords: Preventive Toxicology; Sushruta Samhita; Visha Pariksha; Environmental Health; Toxic Exposure; Non-Communicable Diseases

Introduction

The Ayurvedic principle “Swasthasya Swasthya Rakshanam” highlights the preservation of health through preventive measures. Agad tantra, as a specialized branch, emphasizes the identification, avoidance, and early recognition of Visha (toxic substances).
Sushruta emphasizes that toxins can contaminate food, water, air, and environment, and highlights the importance of early detection and Nivaran (avoidance). The concept that toxins can be present in multiple daily life sources reflects a preventive orientation.
In the modern era, exposure to toxins is continuous and unavoidable due to industrialization, urbanization, and chemical use. These exposures are often chronic, low-dose, and cumulative, leading to long-term diseases such as cancer, cardiovascular disorders, and endocrine dysfunctions. [1] One of the primary mechanisms for this long-term damage is oxidative stress, where an overaccumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) exceeds the body's antioxidant capacity, leading to DNA damage and chronic inflammation. [2],[3] This validates Sushruta’s emphasis on vigilance and prevention rather than treatment alone.

Acute and Chronic Manifestations of Toxicity:

Sushruta describes acute manifestations such as Chardi (vomiting), Daha (burning), Moha (confusion), and Murcha (loss of consciousness), indicating rapid systemic involvement. [4] He also implies gradual systemic derangement in cases of persistent exposure.
Acute toxicity corresponds to high-dose exposures causing immediate symptoms, such as food poisoning or pesticide toxicity. Chronic toxicity, resulting from prolonged low-dose exposure, leads to diseases like cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, cardiovascular diseases, and endocrine abnormalities through mechanisms such as oxidative stress, inflammation, and bioaccumulation.[5], [6]

Materials and Methods

Study Design: This study is based on a qualitative hermeneutic analysis of Sushruta Samhita Kalpa Sthana Chapter 1 along with Dalhana’s commentary. Classical Sanskrit concepts were interpreted and contextualized into contemporary scientific terminology.

Data Categorization: The extracted information was systematically categorized into exposure pathways, clinical manifestations, Visha Pariksha (diagnostic methods), preventive measures and aligned with modern domains such as exposure science, clinical toxicology, diagnostics and public health.

Contemporary Correlation: Classical concepts were correlated with modern toxicological and environmental health literature to validate observations, explain mechanisms, and establish contemporary relevance.

Results

1. Multidimensional Exposure Pathways

Sushruta describes poisoning through diverse routes, demonstrating a sophisticated understanding of exposure science:[7]

  • Anna (Food) – ingestion of contaminated food
  • Pana (Drinks) – toxic liquids
  • Sparsha (Contact) – dermal exposure
  • Vayu (Air) – inhalational exposure
  • Alankara (Ornaments) – metal toxicity
  • Vastra (Clothing) – chemical exposure
  • Shayya (Environment) – environmental contamination
  • Kritrima Visha – artificial or compound toxins

These align with modern exposure routes:

  • Oral
  • Dermal
  • Inhalational
  • Environmental
  • Synthetic/Chemical Toxicity

Anna Visha (Food-borne Toxicity)

Sushruta states that vitiated or poisoned food can be identified by alterations in its Varna (color), Gandha (odor) and Rasa (taste). Consumption of such food leads to clinical manifestations such as Chardi (vomiting), Daha (burning sensation) and Moha/Murcha (impaired consciousness), indicating systemic involvement.

Food remains a primary route for toxin exposure in modern settings. Contamination may arise from microbial toxins, pesticide residues, heavy metals, or intentional/unintentional adulterants.

  • Acute conditions include food poisoning, gastroenteritis, and aflatoxicosis.
  • Chronic conditions include hepatocellular carcinoma, metabolic abnormalities, and endocrine disturbances.

From a mechanistic perspective, ingested toxins are absorbed via the gastrointestinal mucosa, undergo hepatic metabolism, and subsequently exert systemic toxic effects. [8][9]

2. Pana Visha (Water/Drink Toxicity)

Sushruta describes that vitiated or poisoned liquids can be recognized by altered taste, discoloration, or the presence of froth, and their consumption may result in systemic illness.
Contaminated water remains a significant public health concern.

  • Acute conditions include diarrheal diseases and acute arsenic toxicity.
  • Chronic conditions include fluorosis, chronic kidney disease, and various malignancies.

Toxic substances such as arsenic and fluoride tend to accumulate gradually within the body, leading to progressive, multisystem involvement over time. [10][11]

3. Sparsha Visha (Dermal Exposure) : Sushruta explains that toxins can enter the body through contact, leading to local manifestations such as itching, burning sensation, and inflammation.
Dermal exposure is an established route of toxic entry in modern toxicology.

  • Acute conditions include contact dermatitis and chemical burns.
  • Chronic conditions include persistent dermatitis, skin malignancies, and systemic neurotoxicity.

Many toxic agents, particularly lipophilic substances, are capable of penetrating the skin barrier and subsequently entering systemic circulation, producing both local and systemic effects. [12][13]

4. Visha Vayu (Airborne Toxicity) : Sushruta describes contaminated air as a source of poisoning that produces respiratory distress, giddiness, and loss of consciousness, often accompanied by environmental signs such as foul odor.
Air pollution is a major determinant of morbidity and mortality in the present era.

  • Acute conditions include carbon monoxide poisoning and acute respiratory distress.
  • Chronic conditions include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), bronchial asthma, lung cancer, and cardiovascular disorders.

Inhaled toxicants induce oxidative stress and systemic inflammation, contributing to both pulmonary and extrapulmonary disease processes. [14][15]

5. Alankara Visha (Ornament-related Toxicity): Sushruta describes that ornaments contaminated with toxic substances can produce both localized and systemic effects upon contact with the body.
Exposure to toxic metals present in jewelry is a recognized health concern.

  • It may result in allergic contact dermatitis due to metal sensitivity.
  • Lead exposure can lead to anemia and neurotoxic effects.
  • Prolonged exposure may also contribute to renal impairment.

While the skin acts as a barrier, prolonged contact with metal-containing ornaments—especially when combined with sweat—can facilitate the release of metal ions. These ions penetrate the epidermis, where they can bind to proteins (haptens) to cause local allergies or enter the systemic circulation. Once systemic, metals like Lead and Cadmium bioaccumulate in the bones and kidneys, respectively, leading to long-term chronic diseases such as anemia and nephropathy. [16][17]

6. Vastra Visha (Clothing-related Toxicity) : Sushruta describes that garments contaminated with toxic substances can lead to local irritation as well as systemic manifestations upon contact.
Chemicals used in textiles are known to produce various adverse health effects:

  • Skin allergies and hypersensitivity reactions
  • Chronic dermatitis due to prolonged exposure
  • Endocrine disruption from chemical absorption
  • Potential carcinogenic effects associated with certain dyes and finishing agents [18]

Modern textiles often contain residual chemicals from the manufacturing process, such as azo dyes, phthalates, and perfluorinated compounds (PFCs). These substances can be released from the fabric through friction or perspiration and subsequently penetrate the skin barrier. Once absorbed, certain textile chemicals act as endocrine disruptors, mimicking or interfering with natural hormones. Furthermore, some azo dyes can be metabolized by skin bacteria or liver enzymes into aromatic amines, which are established human carcinogens. This progression from external contact to internal pathology mirrors Sushruta's warning that local irritation from garments can lead to grave systemic consequences.

7. Shayya Visha (Environmental Exposure): Sushruta identifies contaminated surroundings (Shayya) as potential sources of toxicity that can adversely affect health.Exposure to indoor and environmental pollutants is associated with multiple health conditions:

  • Asthma and other respiratory disorders
  • Allergic conditions
  • Sick building syndrome
  • Neurological manifestations resulting from chronic exposure

Modern furniture, mattresses, and building materials often off-gas chemicals such as formaldehyde, phthalates, and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs). These substances enter the body via three main routes: inhalation of indoor air, dermal absorption from direct contact with bedding, and ingestion of contaminated house dust [19]. Prolonged exposure to these low-dose environmental stressors induces chronic inflammation and oxidative stress, validating Sushruta's ancient warning that a vitiated environment (Shayya) serves as a persistent source of systemic derangement

8. Kritrima Visha (Artificial/Combined Toxicity): Sushruta describes artificially prepared or Kritrima Visha (compounded poisons) as producing complex, variable, and often delayed effects, reflecting their multifaceted nature.
Exposure to combinations of synthetic chemicals is increasingly common and can lead to:

  • Acute poisoning
  • Malignancies (cancer)
  • Neurodegenerative disorders
  • Endocrine dysfunction
  • Infertility

These outcomes are primarily attributed to synergistic interactions and cumulative toxic effects of multiple agents acting simultaneously or over prolonged periods.[20]

Table 1: Classical Exposure Routes and Their Modern Toxicological Correlation

Classical Route

Classical Description

Modern Equivalent

Examples (Contemporary Context)

Anna (Food)

Poison mixed in food

Food contamination / adulteration

Pesticide residues in vegetables, aflatoxin in grains, food adulterants (e.g., artificial colors, argemone oil)

Pana (Drinks)

Poison in liquids/beverages

Water contamination / beverage toxicity

Heavy metals (lead, arsenic) in drinking water, contaminated milk, alcohol adulteration (methanol poisoning)

Sparsha (Contact)

Poison through skin contact

Dermal exposure to chemicals

Pesticide exposure in farmers, cosmetic chemicals (parabens, mercury), industrial solvents

Vayu (Air)

Toxic air or fumes

Air pollution / inhalational toxicity

PM2.5 pollution, carbon monoxide poisoning, industrial gas leaks (e.g., ammonia, chlorine)

Alankara (Ornaments)

Poison applied to ornaments

Heavy metal exposure through jewelry

Lead or nickel in artificial jewelry causing dermatitis or systemic toxicity

Vastra (Clothing)

Poison through garments

Textile chemical exposure

Azo dyes in fabrics, formaldehyde-treated clothes, flame retardants in garments

Shayya (Bedding/Environment)

Contaminated surroundings

Indoor pollution / surface exposure

Toxic foam in mattresses, household chemicals, indoor air pollutants, mold toxins

Kritrima Visha (Artificial Poison)

Compound or prepared poison

Synthetic chemical toxicity / mixed exposure

Drug overdose, food additives, industrial chemicals, combined pesticide exposure

 

1. Diagnostic Methods (Visha Pariksha): Sushruta highlights a multidimensional approach to poison detection that includes:

  • Sensory evaluation based on alterations in color, odor, and taste
  • Environmental observation, such as the presence of dead animals or unusual surroundings
  • Clinical assessment through recognition of early symptoms [21]

These principles are comparable to modern approaches such as:

  • Preliminary screening techniques for identifying contamination
  • Environmental surveillance and monitoring systems
  • Clinical toxicology practices, including biomarker-based assessment

Sushruta’s emphasis on early recognition prior to the development of systemic toxicity reflects a preventive diagnostic approach, which continues to be an important yet underemphasized aspect in modern toxicology.Modern toxicology has developed advanced diagnostic techniques such as chromatography, spectroscopy, and biosensors. However, the underlying principle of identifying deviations from normal characteristics remains unchanged. In resource-limited settings, traditional observational methods still provide valuable initial screening.

 

Table 2: Classical Detection Methods (Visha Pariksha) and Their Modern Interpretation

Parameter / Medium

Classical Method (Sushruta Reference)

Observed Indicators

Modern Diagnostic Equivalent

Contemporary Example

Anna

(Food)

Sensory examination (Su. Ka. 1/23–25)

Change in color (Varna), smell (Gandha), taste (Rasa), frothing, abnormal texture

Food analysis (chromatography, spectroscopy, microbial testing)

Detection of pesticide residues or food adulterants

Pana

(Drinks )

Observation of liquid properties

Discoloration, unusual taste, sedimentation, froth formation

Water quality testing, toxicology screening

Detection of arsenic or lead in drinking water

Vayu

(Air)

Environmental observation (Su. Ka. 1/31–32)

Foul smell, breathing difficulty, dizziness, sudden illness

Air quality monitoring (PM2.5 sensors, gas detectors)

Detection of carbon monoxide or industrial gas leaks

Sparsha (Skin)

Contact reaction

Itching, burning, redness, swelling, blisters

Dermatological tests, patch testing, toxic exposure biomarkers

Allergic dermatitis due to cosmetics or chemicals

Alankara

(Ornaments)

Surface observation and skin response

Discoloration of metal, irritation on wearing

Heavy metal testing (ICP-MS, XRF analysis)

Lead/nickel contamination in artificial jewelry

Vastra (Clothing)

Observation after use

Skin irritation, rashes, itching after wearing

Textile chemical analysis, allergen testing

Formaldehyde-treated garments causing irritation

Shayya (Bedding/Environment )

Environmental clues

Dead insects, foul odor, discomfort, illness in occupants

Environmental toxicology assessment, indoor air quality tests

Mold toxins, indoor pollutants, chemical-treated furniture

General Environment

Observation of surroundings

Dead animals, withered plants, abnormal ecosystem changes

Ecological monitoring, bioindicator species

Industrial contamination affecting ecosystem

Clinical Symptoms

Early Lakshana observation

Daha (burning), Chardi (vomiting), Moha (confusion), Murcha (fainting)

Clinical toxicology, blood/urine biomarkers

Early signs of poisoning (e.g., organophosphate toxicity)

 

 

2. Preventive Measures in Agad tantra
Sushruta outlines a comprehensive preventive approach aimed at minimizing toxic exposure in daily life. These strategies are practical, observation-based, and integrated into routine behavior:

  • AnnaPana Pariksha (Inspection of food and water): Careful examination of food and drink for changes in color, smell, taste, or texture before consumption is emphasized. This serves as a primary safeguard against ingestion of contaminated or poisoned substances.
  • Anupayukta Dravya Nivaran (Avoidance of suspicious substances): Sushruta advises refraining from consuming or using substances that appear doubtful or altered, thereby preventing both intentional and accidental poisoning.
  • Parivesha Pariksha (Environmental awareness): Observation of surroundings, including air quality, presence of unusual odors, or abnormal ecological signs (e.g., dead animals), is recommended to identify potentially toxic environments.
  • Sparsha Nivaran (Avoidance of contact with toxins) : Direct contact with harmful substances, contaminated objects, or treated materials is to be avoided to prevent dermal absorption and systemic toxicity.

These classical preventive principles closely align with modern public health and preventive toxicology practices:

  • Food safety measures: Inspection and quality control of food help prevent ingestion of microbial toxins, pesticides, and adulterants, thereby reducing the incidence of foodborne illnesses, gastrointestinal disorders, and long-term risks such as hepatotoxicity and cancer.
  • Water purification practices: Ensuring access to clean and treated water prevents exposure to contaminants such as heavy metals, pathogens, and industrial pollutants, thereby reducing the risk of chronic conditions like fluorosis, renal disease, and carcinogenesis. [22]
  • Environmental awareness and monitoring: Awareness of environmental hazards, including air pollution and contaminated surroundings, helps minimize exposure to toxic agents responsible for respiratory diseases, cardiovascular conditions, and neurological disorders.
  • Protective and occupational safety measures:Avoidance of direct contact with harmful substances through the use of protective barriers and safe handling practices reduces dermal absorption and occupational exposure, thereby preventing conditions such as dermatitis, systemic toxicity, and long-term complications. [23]

3. Correlation with Modern Preventive Frameworks

Modern public health systems are built upon structured and institutionalized strategies aimed at reducing exposure to harmful agents. These include food safety regulations, water quality surveillance, environmental protection measures, and occupational safety standards, which collectively function to monitor, control, and mitigate toxic risks at a population level. Such frameworks rely heavily on scientific assessment, regulatory enforcement, and technological interventions to identify hazards and limit their impact.

For instance, food safety systems involve standardized inspection, laboratory testing, and quality control to detect contaminants. Similarly, water quality monitoring employs chemical and microbiological analysis to ensure safety for consumption. Environmental protection mechanisms track pollution levels, while occupational safety guidelines focus on minimizing workplace exposure through protective equipment and safety protocols. These measures are essential in managing large-scale risks in complex modern environments.

Despite their effectiveness, modern preventive systems are predominantly:

  • Regulatory in nature, meaning they are governed by laws, standards, and compliance mechanisms
  • Reactive in approach, often identifying and controlling hazards after their emergence or detection

In contrast, Agad tantra presents a fundamentally different paradigm: It is preventive and anticipatory, emphasizing early recognition of subtle changes in food, environment, and surroundings before exposure occurs It relies on individual awareness, sensory evaluation, and behavioral discipline, rather than solely on external regulatory systems. It promotes a continuous vigilance model, where prevention is integrated into daily life rather than applied as an external intervention. [24]

The integration of these two approaches offers a more comprehensive model of disease prevention:

  • Modern frameworks provide large-scale monitoring, scientific validation, and regulatory control
  • Agad tantra contributes individualized, early-stage detection and proactive avoidance strategies

By combining population-level regulation with individual-level vigilance, it is possible to create a more robust and effective preventive system. Such an integrative approach can significantly enhance the prevention of both acute toxic exposures and chronic diseases, particularly non-communicable diseases driven by long-term environmental and chemical exposures.

4. Role in Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases
Sushruta emphasizes the Visha Nivaran (avoidance of toxic substances) as a central strategy for preserving health. Agad tantra focuses not merely on treating disease after its onset, but on preventing exposure at its origin by recognizing and avoiding contaminated food, water, air, and materials. This reflects an advanced understanding that repeated or unnoticed exposure to toxins can gradually disrupt physiological equilibrium, ultimately resulting in disease.
Current medical research increasingly recognizes that non-communicable diseases (NCDs) have significant environmental and toxicological underpinnings. Chronic exposure to pollutants and chemicals contributes to disease development through mechanisms such as oxidative stress, persistent inflammation, immune imbalance, and genetic alterations.

Cancer: Prolonged exposure to carcinogens such as aflatoxins, heavy metals, industrial chemicals, and air pollutants can induce DNA damage, leading to uncontrolled cellular growth and malignancy. [25]

Cardiovascular Diseases: Pollutants like particulate matter (PM2.5) and toxic metals contribute to endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, and atherosclerotic changes, increasing the risk of hypertension, ischemic heart disease, and stroke. [26]

Neurological Disorders: Exposure to neurotoxic agents such as lead, mercury, and pesticides can impair neuronal integrity, contributing to cognitive decline and neurodegenerative conditions such as Parkinson’s disease. [27]

Endocrine Disorders: Endocrine-disrupting chemicals, including pesticides and synthetic compounds, interfere with hormonal regulation, leading to metabolic disturbances, thyroid dysfunction, and reproductive disorders. [28]

Agad tantra addresses these conditions at their root cause by emphasizing:

  • Early identification of toxic exposure
  • Avoidance of contaminated sources
  • Continuous environmental awareness

This approach closely parallels the modern concept of primary prevention, which aims to eliminate risk factors before disease onset. In contrast to conventional systems that often prioritize disease management, Agad tantra offers a cause-oriented preventive model, making it highly relevant in addressing the growing burden of NCDs.The integration of these classical principles with contemporary scientific insights can strengthen preventive toxicology and contribute to long-term disease reduction and sustainable health outcomes.

Future Scope

  • Incorporation of Agad tantra principles into preventive healthcare systems
  • Advancement of early detection and screening models based on classical and modern approaches
  • Promotion of public health awareness initiatives focusing on toxic exposure and prevention
  • Encouragement of interdisciplinary research integrating Ayurveda, toxicology, and environmental sciences
  • Utilization of these principles in strategies aimed at prevention of non-communicable diseases (NCDs)

Discussion

The present study demonstrates that the preventive principles described in Sushruta Samhita Kalpa Sthana Chapter 1 represent a structured and scientifically relevant understanding of toxic exposure. The classification of exposure pathways—Anna, Pana, Sparsha, Vayu, Alankara, Vastra, Shayya, and Kritrima Visha—closely corresponds to modern oral, dermal, inhalational, and environmental routes. A key strength of Sushruta’s framework is its emphasis on early detection and prevention. The identification of subtle changes in Varna, Gandha, Rasa (sensory attributes) and environmental cues reflects an early concept of preclinical detection, which remains inadequately addressed in modern toxicology that largely depends on post-exposure diagnostics. The correlation between classical exposure pathways and contemporary disease patterns further supports its relevance. Environmental and chemical exposures are now recognized contributors to gastrointestinal, respiratory, cardiovascular, neurological, endocrine disorders, and non-communicable diseases (NCDs). The concept of Kritrima Visha parallels modern concerns of cumulative and synergistic toxicity.

Preventive strategies in Agad tantra emphasize behavioral awareness and avoidance of exposure, aligning with primary prevention of NCDs. [29] However, certain limitations must be acknowledged. The present analysis is interpretative in nature and relies on conceptual correlation between classical texts and modern scientific evidence. There is a need for empirical validation through experimental and clinical studies to further substantiate these correlations. Additionally, integration of classical principles into modern healthcare requires standardization and interdisciplinary collaboration.

Overall, the findings suggest that Agad tantra offers a holistic, anticipatory, and preventive approach to toxicology, which complements modern scientific advancements and has significant potential for application in contemporary public health.

Conclusion

Agad tantra, as described in Sushruta Samhita Kalpa Sthana Chapter 1, provides a comprehensive framework for preventive toxicology, emphasizing exposure pathways, early detection, and avoidance strategies. The close correlation between classical concepts and modern toxicological science highlights their continued relevance, particularly in understanding cumulative toxicity and environmental determinants of disease. Notably, its focus on prevention at the level of exposure offers a valuable approach for addressing the growing burden of non-communicable diseases. Integrating these principles with contemporary scientific and public health systems can strengthen preventive strategies through early detection, individual awareness, and population-level interventions, ultimately contributing to improved health outcomes and sustainable healthcare.

References

  1. Singh, R. P., Chandra, N., Swamy, M., & Bharti, S. (2021). Ecotoxicology and Its Impact on Ecosystem: A Review. Agricultural Reviews, 42(4). https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.r-2206
  2. Saba, S., Srivastava, A., Tripathi, R., Tripathi, S., Trivedi, V. P., & Saxena, R. C. (2012). Toxicity of a Novel Herbomineral Preparation Las01 on Human Cancer Cell Lines and Its Safety Profile in Humans and Animals. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2012, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/948375
  3. Yang, A.-M., Lo, K., Zheng, T.-Z., Yang, J.-L., Bai, Y.-N., Feng, Y.-Q., Cheng, N., & Liu, S.-M. (2020). Environmental heavy metals and cardiovascular diseases: Status and future direction. Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine, 6(4), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdtm.2020.02.005
  4. Sushruta. (2003). Sushruta Samhita (K. A. Shastri, Ed.; 14th ed.). Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthan. (Original work published c. 600 BCE).
  5. Sears, M. E., & Genuis, S. J. (2012). Environmental Determinants of Chronic Disease and Medical Approaches: Recognition, Avoidance, Supportive Therapy, and Detoxification. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2012, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/356798
  6. Singh, R. P., Chandra, N., Swamy, M., & Bharti, S. (2021). Ecotoxicology and Its Impact on Ecosystem: A Review. Agricultural Reviews, 42(4). https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.r-2206
  7. Sushruta. Sushruta Samhita. Shastri KA, editor. 14th ed. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthan; 2003. (Original work published c. 600 BCE).
  8. Shan, Y. (2020). The Toxic Effects of Aflatoxin B1: An Update. In Aflatoxin B1 Occurrence, Detection and Toxicological Effects. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88775
  9. Jaishankar, M., Tseten, T., Anbalagan, N., Mathew, B. B., & Beeregowda, K. N. (2014). Toxicity, mechanism and health effects of some heavy metals. Interdisciplinary Toxicology, 7(2), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.2478/intox-2014-0009
  10. Scope of Agadtantra (Ayurvedic toxicology) in Environmental Pollution w.s.r to Janpadodhvansa & Dushi visha: A Review. Arch Pharm Pract. 2019 Apr 15;10(2).
  11. Chaudhary MM, Hussain S, Du C, Conway BR, Ghori MU. Arsenic in Water: Understanding the Chemistry, Health Implications, Quantification and Removal Strategies. ChemEngineering. 2024;8(4):78. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemengineering8040078
  12. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). (2009). A strategy for assigning new NIOSH skin notations (DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2009-147). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
  13. Bocheva, G., Slominski, R. M., & Slominski, A. T. (2023). Environmental air pollutants affecting skin functions with systemic implications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(13), 10502. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310502
  14. Meena P, Kumar A, Meena S. A review on Vayu visha (Air pollution) in Ayurveda. Int J Ayurveda Pharma Res. 2023;11(6):78-82. https://doi.org/10.47070/ijapr.v11i6.2845
  15. Bocheva G, Slominski RM, Slominski AT. Environmental air pollutants affecting skin functions with systemic implications. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(13):10502. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310502
  16. Bridges J, de Jong W, Draschtba S, et al. Opinion on the safety of the use of Nickel in jewelry and other consumer products. Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks (SCHEER). European Commission; 2021.
  17. Gupta S, Sharma A, Kumar R. Concept of Abharana Visha in Agada Tantra: A Review. International Journal of Ayurveda and Pharma Research. 2023;11(4):45-50.
  18. Rovira J, Domingo JL. Human health risks of exposure to toxic metals and organic pollutants through skin contact with textiles: A review. Environmental Research. 2019;168:320-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.10.012
  19. Gaffin JM, Phipatanakul W. The role of indoor allergens in asthma. Pediatric Clinics of North America. 2014;61(1):61-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2013.09.003
  20. Kortenkamp A. Low dose mixture effects of endocrine disrupters and their implications for regulatory chemical control. Human Reproduction. 2014;29(6):1107-1111. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu054
  21. Binorkar, S. V., Sawant, R. S., Bhat, S., & Joglekar, V. P. (2021). A cross-sectional study on the attitude and knowledge assessment of ayurveda teachers, practitioners and students about practical application of Agadatantra. Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine, 12(1), 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaim.2020.10.007
  22. Chaudhary MM, Hussain S, Du C, Conway BR, Ghori MU. Arsenic in Water: Understanding the Chemistry, Health Implications, Quantification and Removal Strategies. ChemEngineering. 2024;8(4):78. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemengineering8040078
  23. Rovira J, Domingo JL. Human health risks of exposure to toxic metals and organic pollutants through skin contact with textiles: A review. Environ Res. 2019;168:320-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.10.012
  24. Sears ME, Genuis SJ. Environmental Determinants of Chronic Disease and Medical Approaches: Recognition, Avoidance, Supportive Therapy, and Detoxification. Journal of Environmental and Public Health. 2012;2012:1-15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/356798
  25. Shan Y. The Toxic Effects of Aflatoxin B1: An Update. In: Aflatoxin B1 Occurrence, Detection and Toxicological Effects. IntechOpen; 2020. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88775
  26. Yang AM, Lo K, Zheng TZ, et al. Environmental heavy metals and cardiovascular diseases: Status and future direction. Chron Dis Transl Med. 2020;6(4):251-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdtm.2020.02.005
  27. Thakur M, Rachamalla M, Niyogi S, Datusalia AK, Flora SJS. Molecular Mechanism of Arsenic-Induced Neurotoxicity including Neuronal Dysfunctions. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(18):10077. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms221810077
  28. La Merrill MA, Vandenberg LN, Smith MT, et al. Consensus on the key characteristics of endocrine-disrupting chemicals as a basis for hazard identification. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2020;16(1):45-57. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-019-0225-7
  29. Srivastava A, Urmaliya N, Gupta R, Sinha A, Hardeniya P. Ayurvedic management of poisoning. Int J Contemp Res Multidiscip. 2025;4(4):233-240.

 

 

PDF
Insert title here